Arte dei grandi sulle borse Vuitton? Blasfemia manieristica! IT-EN
 |
| LV borsa Van Gogh. |
Quando il cattivo gusto sovrasta anche il buon senso, nascono collezioni che storpiano le opere d'arte più alte e grandi della storia dell'arte, solo per realizzare degli accessori di moda da migliaia di euro. E' quello che sta accadendo con una collezione di un noto brand di moda, tanto blasonato quanto criticato dagli stessi suoi clienti, che sulla pagina FB del marchio si stanno scatenando in una serie di "improperi leciti" contro quella che, a detta di tutti, è un "joke"...una presa in giro delle opere di VanGogh, DaVinci, Rubens e tanti altri.
Si direbbe, cose d'altri tempi, ma in questo tempo, dove tutto sembra lecito, pur di imitare la scia di altri brand più piccoli e magari più originali, anche i producers di Vuitton, "prendono ispirazione" da quelli che hanno maggiore creatività per lanciare sul mercato (bada ben...quello del luxury), una collezione di borse che definire BLASFEME, è un eufemismo.
Come ci si può affidare ad un manierista per reinterpretare (senza usare il vero termine ovvero COPIARE) veri artisti come quelli citati in precedenza, al solo fine di sbatterli su borse, borsette, pochette!?
I commenti dei clienti o estimatori del brand sulla pagina Fb, parlano da soli; indignazione, sconcerto, orrore, addirittura molti che ripiegano su altri marchi. Tutti in sostanza criticano la scelta di LV di sfruttare in malo modo delle opere INCOMPARABILI, oltre alla totale mancanza di originalità.
Uno schiaffo a chi fa dell'arte la propria ragion di vivere, sia dal punto di vista economico che passionale, che sia un artista piccolo o grande, che sia un autore, che sia un critico, tutte queste persone vivono della vera arte. Vedere una simile storpiatura in vendita a prezzi da capogiro, fa davvero ribrezzo!
Molti grandi brand hanno investito per salvaguardare monumenti ed opere mondiali (Tod's per il Colosseo per citarne uno)...Altri come LV invece tentano maldestramente di utilizzarli a proprio vantaggio solo e prettamente economico e di certo non artistico ne di salvaguardia.
Ministro Franceschini: "...che cosa dice di questa ennesima presa per i fondelli verso l'arte!?..."
EN
When the ridiculous overwhelms common sense, then collections arise, stifling the highest and greatest artworks of art history, only to make fashion accessories costing thousands of euros. This is what is happening with a collection of a well-known brand of fashion, so much blossomed as criticized by its customers, that on the FB page of the brand are emerging into a series of "lawless impropers" versus what everyone says It's a "joke" ... a teasing of VanGogh, DaVinci, Rubens and many other real masters of world art of all time.
It would be said, "things of the past," but at this time, where everything seems lawful, to imitate the trail of other smaller and perhaps more original brands, even Vuitton's producers "take inspiration" from those who have More creativity to launch on the market (well ... that of luxury), a collection of bags that define BLASFEMY, is a euphemism.
How can you entrust a manierist to reinterpret (without using the true term or COPY) true artists like those mentioned earlier, just to print them on purses, handbags, clutches !?
Customer comments or brand admirers on LV page Fb, speak clearly; Indignation, disorientation, horror, and even many who fall back on other brands. All in essence criticize the choice of LV to exploit the INCOMPARABLE works of art in addition to the total lack of originality.
A slap to those who make art their own reason to live, both from the economic and passionate point of view, that it is a small or great artist, that it is an author, that is a critic, all these people live with true art. See such a crap for sale at exaggerated prices, it really makes you crap!
Many great brands have invested in safeguarding monuments and world works (Tod's for the Colosseum to name one) ... Others like LV instead are tempted to use them for their own benefit, purely economic and certainly not artistic, in safeguarding the artistic heritage.
Minister Franceschini: "What do you say about this yet another grip for the fundamentals of art! ...?"
EN
When the ridiculous overwhelms common sense, then collections arise, stifling the highest and greatest artworks of art history, only to make fashion accessories costing thousands of euros. This is what is happening with a collection of a well-known brand of fashion, so much blossomed as criticized by its customers, that on the FB page of the brand are emerging into a series of "lawless impropers" versus what everyone says It's a "joke" ... a teasing of VanGogh, DaVinci, Rubens and many other real masters of world art of all time.
It would be said, "things of the past," but at this time, where everything seems lawful, to imitate the trail of other smaller and perhaps more original brands, even Vuitton's producers "take inspiration" from those who have More creativity to launch on the market (well ... that of luxury), a collection of bags that define BLASFEMY, is a euphemism.
How can you entrust a manierist to reinterpret (without using the true term or COPY) true artists like those mentioned earlier, just to print them on purses, handbags, clutches !?
Customer comments or brand admirers on LV page Fb, speak clearly; Indignation, disorientation, horror, and even many who fall back on other brands. All in essence criticize the choice of LV to exploit the INCOMPARABLE works of art in addition to the total lack of originality.
A slap to those who make art their own reason to live, both from the economic and passionate point of view, that it is a small or great artist, that it is an author, that is a critic, all these people live with true art. See such a crap for sale at exaggerated prices, it really makes you crap!
Many great brands have invested in safeguarding monuments and world works (Tod's for the Colosseum to name one) ... Others like LV instead are tempted to use them for their own benefit, purely economic and certainly not artistic, in safeguarding the artistic heritage.
Minister Franceschini: "What do you say about this yet another grip for the fundamentals of art! ...?"
